EW# 6894
Speaking to concerned parents, professionals and
citizens. Counseling parliaments, legislatures
and courts worldwide. · Author
· Researcher
· Lecturer
· Educator
· Expert Witness
· · · · · · Science Advisor: Subcommittee on Junk Science, The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) 2,400 State Legislators (1999-2004)
EW # 6894 is sought worldwide to speak, lecture, testify, and counsel individuals, organizations, professionals and governments regarding a) fraudulent sex science, sex education and b) the power and effect of images and the monopoly media to alter human brain, mind, memory and conduct. The special emphasis of her work has been and continues to be the negative influence of these change agents upon children and society.
EW # 6894 has been a consultant to four U.S. Department of Justice administrations, The U.S. Department of Education, as well as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. EW # 6894 is listed in numerous Who’s Who biographies such as: Who’s Who in Science & Engineering, International Who’s Who in Sexology, International Who’s Who in Education, Who’s Who of American Women and The World’s Who’s Who of Women. Her scholarly findings have had international legislative and scientific import in the United States, Israel, South Africa, Canada and Australia. Washington, DC: , Expert witness, Testimony before the Subcommittee on Science Technology, and Space of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
April 2004: Science Advisor: Subcommittee on Junk Science, The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), 2,400 State Legislators (1999-2004 ), for ALEC.
INTERNATIONALLY
SOUTH AFRICA, 1995 : The Office of the Attorney General thanks EW# 6894 for “your knowledge and your expertise.... your assistance in saving this nation from a potential disaster.... we have achieved a major victory on the pornography front.... which would not have been possible without the aid of your expert knowledge, books, videos and articles.” EW# 6894’s testimony on the ways graphic, antisocial imagery reconfigures brain, mind and memory helped pass The Film and Publications Bill of 1995 , by an overwhelming majority of 300 votes, prohibiting child pornography in any form (written, visual, cartoon, “artistic” or pseudo), and prohibiting current types of “adult” pornography. AUSTRALIA, Parliament 1994 and 1992: Following her 1992 invited testimony and report on pornography and the harm factor to the Senate Select Committee on Community Standards, Parliament banned "X" Rated materials from pay cable TV, while her March 1994 research paper aided Parliament’s decision, based on harm, to similarly ban "R" Rated materials from pay cable TV. CANADA , Supreme Court 1992: EW# 6894 provided briefing materials on pornography and harm, aiding the Canadian Supreme Court's unanimous decision to ban all pornography as "obscene" as it undermines equality by degrading, subjugating and dehumanizing women. NEW ZEALAND , Tribunal 1991 and 1989: EW# 6894’s research was delivered by-proxy to the New Zealand Pornography Commission investigations in 1989. EW# 6894 was again asked for, and delivered, written testimony to the New Zealand Indecency Tribunal in 1991. ISRAEL , Knesset 1982: EW# 6894 founded a media monitoring, non-profit foundation in Israel, funded by private and public sources that have presented findings on Israeli media to the Knesset and throughout Israel. At minimum, major corrections and improvements were made in controlling advertisements, largely due to EW # 6894’s data collection, cadre training, and public dissemination of information. THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Massachusetts , 1989 Ohio , 1989
USA LOWER COURTS
C. v. L, 1996 : The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the right of California’s news rack laws to protect minors in support of Amici arguments by the National Law Center for Children and Families. Amici cited to EW # 6894’s Canadian paper, that “Images reach the brain more quickly than print” (15). S v. P, 1994 and 1991 : The lower court in 1991, cited EW # 6894’s book in rejecting S’s appeal. Upon challenge in 1994, CRRE and EW # 6894 filed an Amicus brief in support of the Department of Defense ruling, that homosexuality and sexual conduct cannot be separated. G.P.X.K, wrote of EW # 6894’s “groundbreaking work in K,S&F,” (October 5, 1994) in recommending she and C.R. enter the case. U v. K, 1994 : The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third District, ruled in support of arguments presented in the Institute for Media Education Amicus and A & P written with C.R.R. and R.S., citing EW # 6894’s research on images and for OJJDP, to protect children from use in child pornography. TEXAS , 1993: Despite obstructions, the Court’s successful use of EW # 6894’s findings continues. A Texas prosecutor wrote the following: As a prosecuting attorney, I have tried approximately 35 obscenity jury trials in which the defense has called a sociologist as an expert witness on community standards. Your book, has proven invaluable on cross-examination. This sociologist studied bases a lot of expert opinions on his studies at that institute. To be able to point out to the jury the fraud that A. K. and his institute have perpetrated is a very effective tool…I encourage you to continue your work in this area to point out to the public the frauds sociology and psychology have given us (March 8, 1993). OHIO , 1991: O v. C.A C., : The presiding judge rules in agreement with EW # 6894’s expert testimony re: what was M.’s artistic “whole” to be viewed by the jury. F.P., the State prosecutor writes: As you know, the State filed a Motion regarding what constituted the “whole” as that issue related to the exhibit. Your testimony was critical to the Motion, and your testimony ensured a favorable ruling for the State…The issues and interpretation you presented concerning the child photographs and the remaining photographs substantiated the prosecution’s view…The perspective you established was both concise and persuasive, and should be considered in any interpretation of pornography and its affect in both children and adults (March 4, 1991). CALIFORNIA , 1989: County Superior Court cites EW # 6894’s research to convict a child pornography cartoonist.
Mr. H indicated that EW # 6894’s report was extremely helpful throughout the prosecution of the case. Mr. H used the report as a reference source for putting together his closing arguments, and for his cross examination…Mr. H considers your report to be a great piece of work, and has recommended the report…to the National Association of District Attorneys…your report…was a great help in the prosecution of this case (March 28, 1989).
EW # 6894 has been successfully consulted on sexual harassment in the Minnesota workplace; on a mother’s rights to child custody from an AIDS father in Kentucky; in testimony before the Attorney General’s Commission on pornography; on homosexual versus parents rights in a Connecticut classroom on fraudulent sex education in public schools. She is currently consultant for a first amendment versus parental rights case involving one government school, in a second school versus parents’ case involving subversion of parents to provide contraception to minors and a third case involving sexual harassment in the workplace. LEGISLATION:
WASHINGTON , D.C. . US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation Expert Witness
Description: Testimony examining brain science related to pornography addiction and the effects of such use and addiction on families and communities. Washington , D.C. , December 1995: A Bill to determine if A. K.’s articles are the result of any fraud or criminal wrongdoing: 41 co-sponsors; carried over to 1997-1998 legislature to investigate the data. This Bill is the culmination of EW # 6894’s 20-years of research and advocacy for children. A Senate hearing waits in the wings. Minnesota , 1993: After a last-minute briefing and presentation of pedophile exhibits by EW # 6894 to Minnesota legislators, “affectional orientation” language, which allows children to be in legal sexual relationships with adults, is removed from two pending Minnesota laws.
Georgia , 1 992: Heeding EW # 6894’s exhibits and expert testimony on February 13, 1992, the State of Georgia House Education Subcomm
|
|
